Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-20649
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Abhishek @ Vicky
State of Haryana
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL
Present:
SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE
1.
in case FIR No. 155 dated 28.04.2024 under Sections 406, 420 IPC (Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, 1983, added later on) registered at Police Station Ambala City.
2.
breach of trust along with offence punishable under the Immigration Act, 1983, where the allegation is that he took Rs. 12 lacs for sending complainant’s daughter abroad.
3.
witness has been examined by the prosecution.
4.
offence of similar nature registered against him. 20649-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Abhishek @ Vicky
Versus State of Haryana
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE Mr. Anand Rohilla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) This is first petition filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 155 dated 28.04.2024 under Sections 406, 420 IPC (Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, 1983, added later on) registered at Police Station Ambala City. The petitioner is alleged with offence of cheating, forgery and breach of trust along with offence punishable under the Immigration Act, 1983, where the allegation is that he took Rs. 12 lacs for sending complainant’s daughter abroad. The trial has though commence witness has been examined by the prosecution. The petitioner has criminal antecedents, as he has also another offence of similar nature registered against him. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20649-2025
Date of decision : 10.07.2025
…….Petitioner
….Respondent NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE , Advocate, Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ( Oral ) petition filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 155 dated 28.04.2024 under Sections 406, 420 IPC (Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, 1983, added later on) The petitioner is alleged with offence of cheating, forgery and breach of trust along with offence punishable under the Immigration Act, 1983, where the allegation is that he took Rs. 12 lacs for sending ugh commenced, but it is informed that no witness has been examined by the prosecution. The petitioner has criminal antecedents, as he has also another offence of similar nature registered against him. 2025 .2025
…….Petitioner ….Respondent
petition filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 155 dated 28.04.2024 under Sections 406, 420 IPC (Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act, 1983, added later on) The petitioner is alleged with offence of cheating, forgery and breach of trust along with offence punishable under the Immigration Act, 1983, where the allegation is that he took Rs. 12 lacs for sending d, but it is informed that no The petitioner has criminal antecedents, as he has also another NAROTAM DASS 2025.07.11 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-20649
5. witnesses are examined before the petitioner is released on regular bail. 6.
petitioner to re
July 10, 2025 narotam
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
20649-2025 In view of above, it would be advisable that t witnesses are examined before the petitioner is released on regular bail. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to re-visit the Court after examination of the complainant. , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- In view of above, it would be advisable that the main prosecution witnesses are examined before the petitioner is released on regular bail. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed with liberty to the visit the Court after examination of the complainant. ( SHEEL NAGU )
CHIEF JUSTICE
Yes/No Yes/No
he main prosecution Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed with liberty to the NAROTAM DASS 2025.07.11 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment