Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47217 (KAR)

Y RADHIKA POULTRY FARMS v. BANK OF BARODA

WP/101810/2025 · 2025-03-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5378 WP No. 101810 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101810 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: Y.RADHIKA POULTRY FARMS, REPRESENTED BY ITS OWNER, SMT. RADHIKA RAVINDRA RAO, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NEW SHIVAPURA, SHIVAPURA, KOPPAL TALUK, KARNATAKA-583 231. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOURABH HEGDE AND SRI. PRASHANT.F.GOUDAR., ADVOCATES) AND: BANK OF BARODA, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KOPPAL BRANCH, GADAG KOPPAL ROAD, KOPPAL TALUK, KARNATAKA-583 231. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. GIRISH.S.HULMANI., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5378 WP No. 101810 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri.Sourabh Hegde., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Girish S.Hulmani., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated:27.02.2025 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-D. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing the respondent to consider the representation dated:27.02.2025 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-D. Counsel for the respondent submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the respondent to consider the representation dated:27.02.2025 submitted by the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5378 WP No. 101810 of 2025 petitioner vide Annexure-D in accordance with the law, within four weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71