Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47215 (AP)

P. Krishna Kishore Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30445/2025 · 2025-11-18

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010589552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30445/2025 Between: 1. P. KRISHNA KISHORE REDDY,, S/O. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC DOCTOR R/O. D.NO.5/44, GUDAVANDLAPALLE VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH LOKAYUKTHA, ROOM NO.2, A.P. STATE GUEST HOUSE, DHAMMAPET, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT REP., BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA REVENUE DIVISION Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, O.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, KADAPA RURAL REGISTRATION OFFICE KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 7. THE SENIOR ASSISTANT, O/O. TAHSILDAR, C.K.DINNE MANDAL Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Ref.No.B/346/2025, dated 21.05.2025 issued by the respondent No.5 directing the respondent No.6 to complete the preparation work for cancellation of the Sale Deed, dated 06.05.2022 registered as document No.4043 of 2022 executed in my favour, unilaterally, under the purported compliance of the Orders said to have been passed by the respondents No.2 and 3 that too without adhering to due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, quite contrary to the procedure envisaged under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta Act, 1983, the Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta and Up-Lokayukta Rules, 1984 and the Registration Act, 1908 and also the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same in so for as the sale deed, dated 06.05.2022 registered as document No.4043 of 2022 executed in my favour IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings, inpursuance of the proceedings in Ref.No.B/346/2025, dated 21.05.2025 issued by the respondent No.5 in so for as the sale deed, dated 06.05.2022 registered as document No.4043 of 2022 executed in my favour, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, as cause does not survive. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 19.11.2025 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.30445 of 2025 19.11.2025 RD