Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47213 (AP)

Shaik Anwar Basha v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11831/2019 · 2025-09-25

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010260042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11831/2019 Between: 1. SHAIK ANWAR BASHA, S/O. LATE MASTAN, AGE 52 YEARS, R/O. MADANURU VILLLAGE, KOTHAPATNAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTHAPATNAM POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, 4. SHAIK KHATHUNABHI, W/O. LATE MASTAN, AGE 71 YEARS, R/O. 5TH WARD, MADANURU, KOTHAPATNAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the 2 action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with Petitioner's life, liberty and property pending in civil court, at the instance of the respondent No. 4 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents and its subordinates not to interfere with the Petitioner's life, liberty and property pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11831 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Thota Ramakoteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conference would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 26.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11831 of 2019 Date: 26.09.2025 PSA