SRI VINAYAKA S/O ISHWAR SANKAPALE v. SRI DR RUDRESH GHALI
CCC/100101/2025 · 2025-06-10
K V Aravind, R Devdas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47210 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47210 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7465-DB CCC No. 100101 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100101 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SRI. VINAYAKA S/O. ISHWAR SANKAPALE, AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO.102/2, KOLIPETH, MARATHA GALLI, HUBBALLI-580020.
…COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. GOURI SHANKAR MOT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. DR RUDRESH GHALI, THE COMMISSIONER, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, R/O. LAMINGTON ROAD, HUBBALLI-580029.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS, M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-01, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR A1;
SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR A2)
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 13/12/2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD SITTING AT HUBBALLI IN MA.NO.5016/2022, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7465-DB CCC No. 100101 of 2025
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 06.06.2025 stating that the parties herein have settled the matter amicably and therefore the petitioner does not wish to pursue the contempt petition.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to just exception. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE
CLK CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7