Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35268 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2024 Thana- Charkapathar District- Jamui ====================================================== Dilip Yadav, S/o Doman Yadav, R/o Village- Tarbank, P.S.- Charkapathor, Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Charkapathar P.S. Case No. 128 of 2024 for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant who is a chaukidar of the Charkapathar village, went to serve the bailable warrant to the petitioner and his brother who are the accused persons in the complaint case, assaulted him with lathi and rod causing him injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The informant met with an accident and received
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35268 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 abrasion injury and demanded some rupees for treatment and when the same was refused, present case has been lodged. The doctor found the injury of abrasion on forehead of informant. The allegation is against two accused persons however, only one injury is found on the person injured which creates doubt in prosecution case. Petitioner is in jail custody since 30.12.2024. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions on behalf of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in Charkapathar P.S. Case No. 128 of
2024.
khushbu/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T