Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47196 (CHH)

GEETA BAI NIRMALKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/9660/2025 · 2025-11-26

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57711 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9660 of 2025 Geeta Bai Nirmalkar W/o Gaukaran Nirmalkar, Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Khadenadih, P.S. Doundilohara, Distt. Balod (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through, P.S. Doundilohara, District Balod (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 27/11/2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as she has 2 been arrested in connection with Crime No. 96/2025, registered at Police Station Doundilohara, District- Balod (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 238, 3(5) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. The prosecution story in brief, is that, it is alleged against the present applicant that she along with other co-accused with intention, killed deceased Manohar Nirmalkar by electrocution. 3. It was argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. At the time of incident, the present applicant was sleeping with her family in her house. The present applicant is implicated in the present case only on the basis of memorandum of co-accused. The deceased was habitual drunker and therefore he might have touched the electricity wire and died and there was no injury of marpit found over the body of the deceased. The applicant is in jail since 18.07.2025 and conclusion of the trial will take some time. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application and submits that all the evidences are against the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & 3 gravity of the offence, material available in the case dairy, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant and the co-accused planned and committed murder of the deceased. Also, considering the fact that the deceased died due to severe shock, therefore, it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the bail application of applicant- Geeta Bai Nirmalkar involved in Crime No. 96/2025 under aforesaid sections at Police Station- Doundilohara, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh, is rejected. 7. However, this Court hopes and trusts that the Trial Court shall make earnest endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously as soon as possible in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima