Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47190 (AP)

DATLA SRINIVASA RAJU v. SAGIRAJU SAMBASIVA RAJU

CC/350/2025 · 2025-12-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010059012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 350/2025 Between: 1. DATLA SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O DATLA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 12-83, SALIPETA, NEAR RAMALAYAM, UNDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. DATLA RAVI KUMAR,, S/O DATLA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 12-83, SALIPETA, NEAR RAMALAYAM, UNDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SAGIRAJU SAMBASIVA RAJU, S/O. SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. UNDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. SMT SAGIRAJU SURYAKUMARI, W/O.SAMBASIVA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. UNDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for committing willful 2 contempt of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dt. 23.01.2025 in W.P. No.321 of 2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the District Collector/ Chairman DLIC, West Godavari District, Bhimavaram to inspect the fish tanks dug by the Respondents herein along with an Advocate Commissioner of this Hon'ble Court to note the physical features taking into consideration the points that may be raised Work Memo to be filed before them by the Petitioners and submit a detailed report before this Hon'ble Court pending disposal of the above Contempt Case and grant IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with filing of English Translated Copies of the news items dt:22.01.2025 and 23.01.2025 in the above CC for the present and grant Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.350 of 2025 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 23.01.2025, in W.P.No.321 of 2025, directed the respondent Nos.9 and 10 therein to maintain status quo existing as on the date of granting of the order. For non-compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed. Learned counsel for respondents submits that W.P.No.321 of 2025 was dismissed on 15.10.2025, granting liberty to petitioners to avail alternative remedies as provided under APSADA Act, 2020. Therefore, nothing survives in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025 KBN 4 50 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.350 of 2025 02.12.2025 KKBBNN