TABEER FATIMA D/O SHRI MOHAMMAD QUMER SIDDIQUE v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
CW/14579/2022 · 2025-10-31
Sanjeet Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47187 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47187 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43723] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14579/2022 Tabeer Fatima D/o Shri Mohammad Qumer Siddique, Aged About 24 Years, R/o M.b. Road Rajban, Tonk, Rajasthan - 304001. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Regional Director, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan-
305001.
2. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Chairman- Chief Executive Of The Board, Shiksha Kendra- 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092.
3. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Secretary, Shiksha Kendra - 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-
110092.
4. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Controller Of Examination, Shiksha Kendra- 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092.
5. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Director Of Academics, Shiksha Kendra- 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vartika Mehra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav, Adv. Mr. Vishivas Saini, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 31/10/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayers:-
"1. By issuance of writ of mandamus, direct the respondents to amend the parents name in secondary and higher secondary mark-sheets and the passing certificates.
2. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which the Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the
judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jigya
[2025:RJ-JP:43723] (2 of 2) [CW-14579/2022] Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian / Father Hari Singh) v. C.B.S.E. (Central Board of Secondary Education) & Ors. (Civil Appeal No.3905/2011) as well as the order dated 20.09.2021 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Tanuj Agarwal v. The Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14349/2019), the respondent - C.B.S.E. is required to consider the request of the petitioner for change of names of her parents.
3. Mr. M.S. Raghav, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent - C.B.S.E. and submits that in view of the directions contained in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra), the respondent - C.B.S.E. has already formed the Standard Operating Procedure (S.O.P.) for consideration of such cases and further submits that if the petitioner submits the application through concerned School as per the S.O.P., the same will be considered by the respondent - C.B.S.E.
4. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make appropriate application through concerned School for change of name as per the S.O.P. of the respondent – C.B.S.E, within period of 15 days. The petitioner is also required to submit all documents as required by the C.B.S.E.
5. In case, such an application is filed, the respondent - C.B.S.E. is
directed to decide the same within a period of three weeks thereafter, in terms of the directions contained in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra).
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /31