Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47180 (RAJ)

ALL INDIA FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALERS FEDERATION v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WMAP/430/2025 · 2025-10-27

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43179] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 430/2025 All India Fair Price Shop Dealers Federation, Rajasthan, Tehsil Unit Chomu Through Its Tehsil President Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/o Prabhu Dayal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village And Post Barwada, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Applicant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Food Secretary, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Additional Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supply Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The District Collector (Supply), Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. 5. The District Supply Officer-I, District Supply Office, Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. 6. The District Supply Officer-II, District Supply Office, Collectorate, Banipark, Jaipur. 7. Manager (Civil Supply), Rajasthan State Food And Civil Supply Corporation, Collectorate Premises, Jaipur City, Jaipur. ----Non-Applicants For Applicant(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma with Mr. Prince Choudhary for Mr. Subhash Sharma For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Prashant Vijay for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/10/2025 An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is moved for modifying/ rectifying the order dated 18.09.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 18.09.2025 it was directed that respondent No.2 shall consider the [2025:RJ-JP:43179] (2 of 2) [WMAP-430/2025] representation of the petitioner, however, as the said post is not operational as on date, it may be directed that the said representation shall be considered by respondent no. 3. Learned counsel for the non-applicants has fairly conceded with the aforementioned. In light of the above, the order dated 18.09.2025 to be rectified, and instead of respondent No.2, respondent No.3 is directed to carry out the directions as spelled out therein. It is made clear that no modification is made to the remaining content of order dated 18.09.2025 and the present order shall be treated as part and parcel of the same. Respondent No.3 is directed to comply with the directions spelled out in order dated 18.09.2025, within a period of thirty days from the date of passing of this order. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-153