Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 47179 (BOM)
SH. SIDDHARTH S/O. GHOLUJI GAJBHIYE AND OTHERS v. SMT. RAIBAI WD/O. VASANTRAO DHAKULKAR AND OTHERS
CAW/530/2025 · 2025-03-11
Shri Anil L Pansare
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47179 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47179 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 caw 530.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. Civil Application (CAW) No. 530 of 2025 in Writ Petition No. 7671 of 2023 [Siddharth Gajbhiye and ors. ..vs.. Raibai Dhakulkar and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. T. Purohit, Advocate for the applicants/petitioners
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.
DATED : 11-03-2025 By present application, the petitioners are requesting to permit them to serve respondent nos. 1 and 4 by paper publication.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite efforts, these respondents could not be served. In view of the above and for the reasons set out in the application, the application is allowed. List once respondent nos. 1 and 4 are served.
(Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik 2025:BHC-NAG:2488