Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47175 (RAJ)

RAM RATAN SAINI S/O RAM CHANDRA SAINI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17870/2025 · 2025-11-21

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47320] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17870/2025 Ram Ratan Saini S/o Ram Chandra Saini, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Near Shiv Nursary, Samod Road, Nimadi, Chomu District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to promote the petitioner on the post of Vice Principal under OBC Category w.e.f. 27.09.2025 with all consequential benefits; ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby respondents may kindly be directed in compliance of order dated 29.09.2025 allowed the petitioner to continue serve duties at the present place of posting on the post of Vice Principal [2025:RJ-JP:47320] (2 of 2) [CW-17870/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /106