Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47169 (RAJ)

SMT. KANTA DEVI WIFE OF SHRI GANESH CHAND DADHICH v. THE UNION OF INDIA

CRLW/557/2021 · 2025-11-07

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44779] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 557/2021 Smt. Kanta Devi Wife Of Shri Ganesh Chand Dadhich, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Shriram Nagar, Shiv Medical Store, Near Ajmeri Gate, Phulera, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India, Through The Secretary To The Government Information And Broadcasting Department, New Delhi. 2. Indian Broad Casting Foundation, Through Its Secretary, Having Its Office Located At B-304, 3Rd Floor, Ansal Plaza, Khaligaon Marg, New Delhi. 3. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary To The Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 5. The Advertising Standards Council Of India, Through Its Secretary, Having Its Office Located At 219, Bombay Market, 78, Tardeo Road, Mumbai- 400034. 6. Amitabh Bachchan, Host, K.B.C. Company Limited, Ganyaal Plaza, Andheri (W) Mumbai, Maharashtra-400058 (India). 7. Directors, Arnuesh Kumar And Rahul Verma, K.B.C. Company Limited, Ganyaal Plaza, Andheri (W) Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400058 (India). 8. Soni India Pvt. Ltd., Through Managing Director, A-18, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044 India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order [2025:RJ-JP:44779] (2 of 2) [CRLW-557/2021] 07/11/2025 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. This petition was filed in the year 2021, thereafter, so many opportunities have been granted to the petitioner by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court to cure the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry, however, nothing has been done so far. It appears that petitioner is not interested to pursue this petition on merits. Therefore, the instant criminal misc. petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/79