[2025:RJ-JP:42369] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13106/2025 Rajkumar Meena S/o Mansingh Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Kondar, Police Station Sadar Karauli, District Karauli (Rajasthan) Presently Residing At Tenant Near Bal Garden, Mahesh Nagar, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (South) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused- petitioner in respect of F.I.R. No.313/2025 registered at Police Station Jamdoli, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act. 2. It is submitted that although, while registering the case under Section 8/21, 8/29 of the NDPS Act against the petitioner, recovery of 51 Gms smack (heroine) with packet (net weight 50 gms) has been shown against the petitioner, yet while making arrest and recovery, provisions of Section 42, 50 & 55 of the N.D.P.S Act have not been followed. It is submitted that the quantity alleged to be recovered from the petitioner is less than [2025:RJ-JP:42369] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13106/2025] commercial quantity. There are no antecedents with regard to the N.D.P.S Act. Although, two cases were earlier registered under Section 379 and 380 IPC against the petitioner in the year 2017- 18 however, both these cases have been closed by granting benefit of probation to the petitioner as the same were registered at the time when the petitioner was juvenile. 3. It is further submitted that petitioner is behind the bars since 20th September, 2025 and no further investigation is required to be made from the petitioner. Trial in the case is likely to be take considerably long time. Hence the prayer is made to grant the bail of petitioner in the instant matter. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 6. In the light of the fact that the mode of recovery and arrest has been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner while citing provisions of Section 42, 50 & 55 of the Act of 1985 and the recovery of contraband against the petitioner is less than commercial quantity and there are no past antecedents against the petitioner in respect of the N.D.P.S. Act, without making any comments over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Rajkumar Meena S/o Mansingh Meena shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.313/2025 registered at Police Station Jamdoli District Jaipur City (East) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two [2025:RJ-JP:42369] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13106/2025] sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv) He shall regularly mark his attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O. shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioner. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. 8. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/305