Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47155 (AP)

B M ERRANA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/23250/2024 · 2025-12-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010451142024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23250 OF 2024 Between: 1. B M ERRANA, S/o Late Chinna Hanumanna, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Agriculture, Residents of Doddimekala Village Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 2. Besta Munta Urukundu,, S/o Late Pedda Hanumanna, Aged about 69 years, Occ. Agriculture, Residents of Doddimekala Village Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 3. Besta Munta Ramalinga,, S/o Late Munta Lakshmanna, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, Residents of Doddimekala Village Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Home Department), Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Tahsildar, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 4. Station House Officer, Peddakadabur P.S, Kurnool District. 5. S Lakshmikantha Reddy, S/o Late S. Pedda Somi Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ Agriculture. Residents of Doddimekala Village, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 6. S V Pratap Reddy, S/o Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Agriculture. Residents of Doddimekala Village, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 7. S Bhaskar Reddy, S/o Suryanarayana Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture. Residents of Doddimekala Village, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 8. S Divakar Reddy, S/o S. Chenna Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Agriculture. Residents of Doddimekala Village, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 9. S Venkateswar Reddy, S/oBojji Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture. Residents of Doddimekala Village, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. 10. S Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o S.V. Pratap Reddy Aged about 55 years, Occ. Agriculture. Residents of Doddimekala Village, Peddakadabur Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.4 in not taking appropriate action against the Respondents No.5 to 10 who are obstraining the petitioners and not taking appropriate action on the complaint/representation given by 1st Petitioner dated 23.08.2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 to initiate appropriate action on the complaint/representation given by 1st Petitioner dated 23.08.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23250 OF 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.4 in not taking appropriate action against the Respondents No.5 to 10 who are obstraining the petitioners and not taking appropriate action on the complaint/representation given by 1st Petitioner dated 23.08.2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and pass..…= 2. Heard Sri O.Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that since the subject matter in the present petition is civil in nature, the respondent police have not registered the crime on the complaint dated dt.23.08.2024 made by the petitioners. 4. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.12.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23250 of 2024 Dated.03.12.2025 KKV 63 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.23250 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 03.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV