ABHIMANYU URF AMIT S/O SHRI VIJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12966/2025 · 2025-10-09
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47151 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47151 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12966/2025 Abhimanyu Urf Amit S/o Shri Vijendra Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bahadurpur, Police Station Sadar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Currently Under The Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Bhadadra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/10/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.462/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Alwar, District-Alwar for offences under Sections 19 and 54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that 63 liters of Beer and 70 liters of liquor have been recovered from his possession. Co-accused-Aslam has been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 26.09.2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 04.09.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served
[2025:RJ-JP:41117] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12966/2025] by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Abhimanyu Urf Amit S/o Shri Vijendra Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/205