[2025:RJ-JP:48386] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 15676/2025 Brahamjeet S/o Rajendra, aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Kharaitpura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Raj.) (At present confined in Central Jail, Sewar, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal with Ms. Saroj Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor Mr. Anand Sharma for Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/11/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.51/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 143, 365, 302, 382 & 506 IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material made available on record. 4. First bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 08.07.2024 with liberty to file fresh [2025:RJ-JP:48386] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15676/2025] bail application after examination of the eye-witness-Lokesh before the learned trial Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner summits that the eye- witness Lokesh has been examined and the cross-examination of the said eye-witness creates suspicion whether Lokesh is the eye- witness or not. He also submits that there are several improvements as well as over implication in the statement of the eye-witness-Lokesh. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that the injured eye-witness-Lokesh has given out the active role of the petitioner in committing the offence. The injured eye-witness-Lokesh has been examined as PW-1 and whose statements were recorded before the learned trial Court on 17.05.2025. 7. Subsequent to the examination of the eye-witness-Lokesh, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 28.08.2025 has dismissed the bail application of the co-accused- Khemsingh @ Khemaram @ Khema. 8. On perusal of the statements of the eye-witness-Lokesh, it is revealed that there is an active role of the present petitioner in committing murder of the deceased. There is an allegation against the accused-petitioner alongwith co-accused that before murder of the deceased, they forcefully administered urine to the deceased. 9. Taking into consideration the seriousness and gravity of the allegations against the accused-petitioner and the active role borne out from the statement of the injured eye-witness as [2025:RJ-JP:48386] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15676/2025] against the accused-petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarged the accused-petitioner on bail. 10. Accordingly, this second bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /4