110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-8138-2025 Date of Decision: May 07, 2026 Sansari Lal …Pe..oner Versus Sukhdarshan Kumar …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sharndeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Gurbir S. Sidhu, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Ankush Singla, Advocate for the respondent. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Power of aorney has been filed on behalf of the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record the copy of the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the Appellate Authority, Barnala, in order to contend that maer has already been compromised between the pares and the peoner herein has undertaken to vacate the demised shop up to 30.11.2026 and thus, the rent appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and therefore, in these circumstances, the present peon has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the peoner has not refuted the aforesaid contenon. 4. In view of the aforesaid order dated 30.04.2026 of the Appellate Authority, present revision peon stands disposed of, having been rendered infructuous. May 07, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.05.07 15:09 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order