APHC010505752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25961 OF 2025 Between: 1. BALU BHANU REKHA, W/o. Balu Bal Reddy, Aged about 53 years, R/o.D.No.11-8-918, Sonai Nagar, Sullurpet Town Tirupati District. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 3. The Station House officer, Ojili Police Station, Ojili, Tirupati District. 4. Vemula Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o. Janardhan Reddy, Aged about years, R/o.24-7-36, Flat No.2G, Magunta Layout, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd respondent in the land of anthreatening the petitioner and her husband not to cultivate extent Ac.10.02 cents in Sy.No.229 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 25961 OF 2025 1. BALU BHANU REKHA, W/o. Balu Bal Reddy, Aged about 53 years, 918, Sonai Nagar, Sullurpet Town Tirupati District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 3. The Station House officer, Ojili Police Station, Ojili, Tirupati District. 4. Vemula Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o. Janardhan Reddy, Aged about 36, Flat No.2G, Magunta Layout, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd respondent in the land of anthreatening the petitioner and her husband not to cultivate extent Ac.10.02 cents in Sy.No.229-B1, 230-1P2, 230-1P3 and 416-A situated at IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. BALU BHANU REKHA, W/o. Balu Bal Reddy, Aged about 53 years, ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary 3. The Station House officer, Ojili Police Station, Ojili, Tirupati District. 4. BALU BHANU REKHA, W/o. Balu Bal Reddy, Aged about 53 years, ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary 3. The Station House officer, Ojili Police Station, Ojili, Tirupati District. 4. Vemula Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o. Janardhan Reddy, Aged about 66 36, Flat No.2G, Magunta Layout, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd respondent in the land of anthreatening the petitioner and her husband not to cultivate extent A situated at 2 Ojili Village and Mandal, Tirupati District and handed over the same to the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and 4th respondent and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes by threatening the petitioner and her husband not to cultivate the land of an extent Ac.10.02 cents in Sy.No.229-B1.230-1P2, 230-1P3 & 416-A situated at Ojili Village and Mandal, Tirupati District and handed over the same to the 4th respondent and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25961 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd respondent in the land of and threatening the petitioner and her husband not to cultivate extent Ac.10.02 cents in Sy.No.229-B1, 230-1P2, 230-1P3 and 416-A situated at Ojili Village and Mandal, Tirupati District and handed over the same to the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and 4th respondent and pass such…” 02. Heard Sri C.Subodh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the official respondents. ss 03. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, without there being any crime registered against the petitioner, the police are calling the petitioner every day to the police station and forcing him to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and the petitioner and 4th respondent. 03. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that no crime has been registered against the petitioner as on date. 04. Considering the submissions, this petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow the due process of law in the event of registration of any crime against the petitioner. Further, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station or interfere in the civil disputes in the absence of any crime registered against the petitioner. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 26.09.2025 KKV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25961 of 2025 Dated.26.09.2025 KKV