Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47142 (KAR)

SHRI SURESH S/O. CHANNAPPA VARADANI v. THE TAHASILDAR

WP/106957/2024 · 2025-03-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5376 WP No. 106957 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106957 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI SURESH S/O CHANNAPPA VARADANI, AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NEAR HANNERADU MATH, HUBLI-KARWAR ROAD, DASTIKOPPA VILLAGE, TQ. KALGHATGI, DIST. DHARWAD-581 204. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.H.PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND: TAHASILDAR, REGISTRAR OF BIRTH AND DEATHS, KALGHATGI, DIST. DHARWAD-581 204. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5376 WP No. 106957 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.N.H.Patil., counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for the respondent has appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the application dated:07.02.2024 filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-A. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing the respondent to consider the application dated:07.02.2024 filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-A. AGA submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the respondent to consider the application dated:07.02.2024 filed by the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5376 WP No. 106957 of 2024 petitioner vide Annexure-A and address the grievance in accordance with the law, within six weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68