Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4714 (GAU)

Kaniya Bagang v. The State of AP and 6 Ors

WP(C)/286/2025 · 2025-06-26

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040010532025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/286/2025 Kaniya Bagang Son of Kyama Bagang, resident of Kesse Bagang, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Secretary of Land Management Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Page No.# 2/3 Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:Sariu Tangham Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Sariu Mangha resident of Koloriang II Village PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Romjir Rakshap, K Perme Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. N. Ratan, Addl. Advocate General, AP, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R Date : 27.06 .2025. Heard Mr. R. Rakshap, learned counsel for the petitioner. Having realized that the claim of the petitioner is being considered by the Recommendation Board vide order dated 20.06.2025, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Kurung Kumey District, Mr. R. Rakshap, learned counsel, fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition. Mr. N. Ratan, learned Addl. Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh appears Page No.# 3/3 for the State. Having considered the submissions and perusal of the order dated 20.06.2025, which reflects that claim of the persons interested including the petitioner, is under consideration by the authority, the prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant