1 / 3 2025:CGHC:57459 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2065 of 2025 SB Sales Corporation Through Its Proprietor Smt. Satyabhama Sharma W/o A. K. Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, R/o H.I.G. 1/1 Chithli Housing Board Colony, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, 491441, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Municipal Council Saraipali Through Its Chief Municipal Officer, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 493558 3 - Sub Engineer, Municipal Council Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 493558 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Mayank Mulchandani, Advocate For State/Resp. No. 1 : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate For Resp. No.2 & 3 : Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.11.28 11:05:27 +0530 2 / 3 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 26/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, writs, order, direction to Respondent No. 2 to make the payment of ₹30,11,155/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs eleven thousands, one hundred and fifty five only) towards the Outdoor Garden, Gym Equipment, GI Pipes, etc., supplied by the Petitioner, along with interest @24% per annum from the date of supply until the actual date of payment, in the interest of justice. 10.2. That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioners with cost.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to supply order issued through GeM (Government E- Marketplace), petitioner supplied the goods to respondent No.2/Municipal Council, however, till date, entire payment has not been disbursed in its favour against the good supplied. 3. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3/Municipal Council submits that there is no dispute with regard to supply of goods by the petitioner to respondent No.2, however, payment could not be made because of unavailability of fund. He submits that he may be granted three months time to consider and decide the claim of petitioner in accordance with law and undisputed claim will be disbursed. 3 / 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents annexed along with writ petition. 5. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, particularly submission of learned counsel for respondent No. 2 & 3/Municipal Council, writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the claim of petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen