1 2025:CGHC:55551 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12890 of 2025 1 - Saheban S/o Khakhri Panna Aged About 69 Years R/o Village Jamdi, Tehsil Shankargarh, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 2 - Smt. Kunti Tirkey W/o Late Sitaram Tirkey Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Jamdi, Tehsil Shankargarh, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G.. 3 - Dashrath Ram S/o Situl Aged About 69 Years R/o Village Pasta, Tehsil Dourakochali, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 4 - Fitkori S/o Mani Aged About 71 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Pasta, Tehsil Dourakochali, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 5 - Sahdev Ram S/o Chamru Ram Aged About 72 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Badakimahri, Tehsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 6 - Sigan Ram S/o Bhana Ram Aged About 72 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Badakimahri, Tehsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 7 - Smt. Kawalpati W/o Late Baldev Ram Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Agora, Tehsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Work Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 2 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department Surguja Circle Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 3 - Superintendent Engine Public Work Department Circle Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 4 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department (Bha/road) Division Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Keshwarwani, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 14/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.17 12:55:29 +0530 3