Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47131 (RAJ)

ARPIT @ BHURA S/O JAIPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13535/2025 · 2025-11-19

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46633] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13535/2025 Arpit @ Bhura S/o Jaiprakash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Purana Shahar, Sabji Mandi, Police Station Kotwali, Dholpur-Raj. (Presently Confined At District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.296/2025 registered at Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur for offence under Section 3/25(1)(a) of Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegations against the present petitioner is for possessing one country made pistol and one cartridge without any valid license or permission. He again submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 14.09.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. He also argued that though there are ten cases reported against the present petitioner but in all those cases he has been bailed out. The trial [2025:RJ-JP:46633] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13535/2025] of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Arpit @ Bhura S/o Jaiprakash, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to [2025:RJ-JP:46633] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13535/2025] immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/107