1 2025:CGHC:55553 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12892 of 2025 • Siyaram Dhurwe S/o Late Shri Bistur Singh Aged About 55 Years Working As Teacher, E-Cadre In Government Middle School Bhedagarh, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Under Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. The Director Public Education Department, Mantralaya, Indirawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. The Collector District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4. The District Education Officer District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5. The District Education Officer District Balod Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.B. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kesav Gupta, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 14/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 28-10-2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by the 2 respondent No.4 by which the representation of the petitioner has been rejected. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner who is working on the post of Teacher, E-cadre in Government Middle School, Bhedagarh, District Kabirdham has been transferred from District Kabirdham to District Balod vide impugned order dated 24-10-2025 (Annexure P/1). Thereafter, he moved a representation before the respondent authority which has been turned down, against which the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition. 3. It is well settled position of law that the transfer is an exigency of service and employee cannot insist to remain posted at a particular place forever and it is the employer to post the employee considering the exigency. 4. From bare perusal of the averments made in the petition and the impugned order, I do not find any irregularity or illegality calling any interference by this Court. Accordingly, the instant writ petition being devoid of merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. 5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.18 11:18:08 +0530