[2025:RJ-JP:51099] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7452/2025 1. Ravi S/o Late Shri Prahlad, aged about 35 Years, R/o Har- ijan Basti, Gulal Kund, Police Station Mathura Gate, Dis- trict Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Gangaram S/o Late Shri Prahlad, aged about 31 Years, R/o Harijan Basti, Gulal Kund, Police Station Mathura Gate, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 3. Ramlakhan S/o Late Shri Prahlad, aged about 30 Years, R/o Harijan Basti, Gulal Kund, Police Station Mathura Gate, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through PP 2. Laxman S/o Batto @ Fatto, aged about 74 years, R/o Har- ijan Basti, Gulal Kund, Police Station Mathura Gate, Dis- trict Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/12/2025 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.511/2025 registered at Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan), for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR [2025:RJ-JP:51099] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7452/2025] are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 07.12.2025 received from the SHO, Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur. According to which, parties have entered into compromise. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.511/2025 registered at Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /186