IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11612 OF 2Q2fi Between: 1. Chikati Venkatalakshmi, W/o. Kamal, Aged about 45 vears Occ- Household Duties. R/o. 71*' Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Kumar, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged about 30 71 Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 3. BethaAdinarayana, S/o. Machimu Naidu, Aged about 54 71st Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. W/o. Jagannadham, Aged about 45 Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. Thammayya Chari, Aged years, R/o. 71 Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. W/o. Suryanarayana, Aged about 44 71 Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. years, R/o. years, R/o. years, R/o. 71 about 68 years, R/o. ...Petitioners AND of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Municipal DisTrict^ ^ Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Gu&ur 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam, Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. - h- ui, 3. The Zonal Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Zone-VI, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Tahsildar, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents praying that in one in the No. 2 and 3 in resorting to interfere with the house structures ' illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article : and to consequently direct the respondents of the petitioners as 300-A of the Constitution of India not to demolish the petitioners residential house properties bearing D. Nos.6-81-8/10. 6-81-8/11 8/5/1, 6-81-8/6, 6-81-8/8A and 6-81 6-81- -8/7 in Sy.No.87/1 of Gajuwaka Village Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. lA NO: 1 OF 7091^ Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may oe not to demolish the house structures pleased to direct the respondents existing in the petitioners property bearing D. Nos. 6-81-8/10. 6-81-8/11, 6-81-8/5/1. 6-81-8/6, 6-81-8/8Aand 6-81-8/7 in Sy. No. 87/1 of Gajuwaka Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondents; SRI A.S.C BOSE, SC for MUNICIPALITIES Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010233992025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11612/2025 Between; Chikati Venkatalakshmi and Others ...PETITIONER{S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VVSATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following; 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11612 OF 2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in interfering with the house structures of the Petitioners bearing D.Nos.6-81-8/10, 6-81-8/11, 6-81-8/5/1, 6-81-8/6, 6-81- \ 8/8A and 6-81-8/7 in Sy.No.87/1 of Gajuwaka Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, \ Visakhapatnam District, as illegal and arbitrary. 1 V 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners were granted Possession Certificates by the Respondent No.4 recognizing their long standing position with regard to residential plots in Sy.No.87/1 71 Ward, Gajuwak Village, Visakhapatnam, and as they were threat of > dispossession, the Petitioners filed W.P.No. 29047 of 2022 and wherein this Court had restrained the revenue authorities not to dispossess the Petitioners from the schedule property without due process of law. Now, as there is threat of dispossession from the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the present Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 on instructions submits that there is no interference by the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 3 4. Recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // r ^ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, Secretary Municipal Administration Department State of ndhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. VilaSiapSnlm^®'^’ Visakhapatnam, Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Zone-VI, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Tahsildar, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5. One CC to Sri V V Satish, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri A.S.C.Bose, SC for Municipalities Corporation Municipal Administration & Urban High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 9. Two CD Copies [OPUC] Development, [OUT] RAM \ HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11612 of 2025 £P = 15 MAY 2025 <a C9 ^ . Current deciion . DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS