DARA SINGH S/O SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11492/2022 · 2025-12-04
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49413] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11492/2022
1. Dara Singh S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gayakund Mohalla, Ward No. 5 Kaman, Dist. Bharatpur Rajasthan.
2. Narendra Mishra S/o Shri Ramrax Pal Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Shri Vinaykam I-20, 21 Bhagat Singh Colony,niwaidist. Tonk, Rajasthan.
3. Manoj Kumar Goswami S/o Shri Dilip Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Maruti Colony,plot No. 76, Sanganer Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Lokendra Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Dharm Chand Jain, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Jain Mandir Ke Pas, Purani Deeg, Goverdhan Mod, Deeg Dist. Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
5. Balbir Singh Jain S/o Late Shri Jai Kumar Jain, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Plot No. 30, Averest Colony, Lal Kothi, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Ajay Kumar Babber S/o Shri Murlidhar Babber, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House No. 50, Adarsh Nagar Bundi Road, Kulhadi Dist. Kota, Rajasthan.
7. Arvind Vyas S/o Shri Hari Shankar Vyas, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Uit Quarter No. 05, Rk Colony, Bhilwara Dist. Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of Local Self Government, State Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Personnal And Training, State Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Director, Department Of Local Bodies, Shivaji Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Commissioner Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Greater/heritage Rajasthan.
5. Commissioner Nagar Nigam, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
6. Commissioner Nagar Nigam, Kota, Rajasthan.
[2025:RJ-JP:49413] (2 of 4) [CW-11492/2022]
7. Secretary Uit, Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
8. Deepak Meena S/o Shri Rohitash Meena, R/o 6, Anand Vihar Extension, Triveni Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass, Durgapura, Jaipur.
9. Pawan Kumar Suman S/o Shri Indra Lal Suman, R/o Plot No. 73, Shriji Nagar, Rampura Road, Sanganer Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with Mr. Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Mr. Yadvendra Patel and Mr. Nitish Monga Mr. R.D. Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:-
“1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the action of the respondents may be declared illegal and respondents may further be directed to conduct the exercise while interpretation Rule 37 of the Rules of 1954 and Rule 37 of the Rules of 1963 and they may further be
directed to grant relaxation to the petitioners in experience as granted to other similarly situated employees under the Rules of 1954;
2. By issuing appropriate writ order or direction, the respondent may be directed to consider the candidature of the Petitioners for the Departmental Promotion Committee as the total experience required under the rules is
[2025:RJ-JP:49413] (3 of 4) [CW-11492/2022] being full filed by the petitioners as their experience on the post of J.En. and A.En. Since from the date of joining may kindly be counted or in alternate, the order dated 05.07.2022 (Annex. 1) may be quashed and set aside.
3. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may be directed to implement to the Circular dated 21.06.2022 while considering the case of the Petitioners;
4. That any other order or direction as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fair, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the may be passed in favour of the case Petitioners.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances.
3. Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG and Mr. R.D. Meena put in appearance on behalf of the respondents.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:49413] (4 of 4) [CW-11492/2022] are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/233