Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47115 (AP)

Urlam Suresh, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6920/2022 · 2025-02-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE '/ik oc > Of pj. ^ A PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6920 OF 2022 Between: 1. Uriam Suresh, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged 48 years, R/o. D.No.1-41. Raja Street. Uriam Village, Narasanna peta Mandal, Srikakulam District. 2. Uriam Ammaji., W/o. Venkata Rao, Aged 67 years, R/o. D.No.1-41, Raja Street. Uriam Village, Narasanna peta Mandal. Srikakulam District. 3. Uriam Venkata Rao., Aged 75 years, R/o. D.No.1-41, Raja Street. Uriam Village. Narasanna peta Mandal. Srikakulam District. ...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.. Amaravathi. 2. Wuriti Madhuri,, W/o. Uriam Suresh. Hindu, Aged 39 years, MIG-268 APHB Colony, Srikakulam Town. Srikakulam District. (Defacto Complainant) ...Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court beg to present this present Criminal petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. before this Hon'ble Court praying the present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash entire proceedings in C.C.No. 484 of 2022 ion the file of Judicial Magistrate of 1 Class at Srikakulam against the petitioners/accused 1 to 3, being in abuse of process of law and Court r.A. NO: 1 OF 202? Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC.No. 484 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class at Srikakulam This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri ANASURI ESWAR SAI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri T V JAGGI REDDY, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following order: 1 ■fl/ ® APHC010461402022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6920/2022 Between: Uriam Suresh, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED{S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel forThe Petitioner/accused(S): 1.ANASURI ESWAR SAI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.T V JAGGI REDDY The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6920/2022 ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in C.C.No. 484 of 2022 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of 1®^ Class at Srikakulam. 2. Heard Sri A.Eswar Sai, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance. 3. Learned Counsel representing both the parties would submit that the efforts made for compromise are failed. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners would submit that Accused No.3 died during the pendency of this petition. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners would further submit that dispensing the presence of the Accused No.2 before the Trial Court, the matter may be disposed of. 5. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 6. Considering the submissions made, the petition is disposed of dispensing the presence of the Accused No.2 before the Trial Court unless 3 her presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court, available to raise all their defences and contentions before the Trial the learned Trial Judge is requested to dispose of the matter as possible. However, liberty is Court and as expeditiously As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. / SD/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ / //TRUE COPY// tV- SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judicial Magistrate of 1®* Class at Srikakulam One CC to Sri. Anasuri Eswar Sai, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri, T V Jaggi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT] 2. 3. 4. 5. Three CD Copies SM GSC HIGH COURT DATED:20/02/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.6920 of 2022 2^ 2 4JUL 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION