APHC010486032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26815/2025 Between: 1. M KANAKAMMA, W/O.LATE M.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.19-72, GUNDUGALLU VILLAGE AND POST, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, GUNDUGALLU REVENUE VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SMT MANGAMMA, W/O.JAYARAMAIAH, AGEDABOUT 60 YEARS. CULTIVATION, GUNDUGALLU VILLAGE AND POST, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the constitution of India declaring the high-handed acts of the respondents in particular of the 3rd respondent in Mutating the name of the 5th Respondent in 1-B Namuna bearing Sy.No.220/1 an extent of Ac.1.10 cents out of Acers 2.57cents of our property at Gundugallu revenue village, Gangavaram mandal, Chittoor District under khata No.670 without notice to us, is illegal, arbitrary, improper and un-just and contrary to principals of the natural justice and consequently direct the 5th respondent to remove the 1-B Namuna from the Government web 2 land stands in the name of 5th respondent under khata No.670 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the 1-B Namuna stands in the name of 5th respondent for an extent of acres 1.10 cents out of acres 2.57 cents in Sy.No.220/1 of Gundugallu revenue village, Gangavaram mandal, Chittoor district granted illegally without notice to us by the 3rd respondent at the instance of 5th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BASHA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 26815 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the high-handed acts of the respondents in particular of the 3rd respondent in Mutating the name of the 5th Respondent in 1-B Namuna bearing Sy.No.220/1 an extent of Ac.1.10 cents out of Acers 2.57 cents of petitioner’s property at Gundugallu revenue village, Gangavaram mandal, Chittoor District under khata No.670 without notice, is illegal, arbitrary, improper and un-just and contrary to principals of the natural justice and consequently direct the 5th respondent to remove the 1-B Namuna from the Government web land stands in the name of 5th respondent under khata No.670 and pass such order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the official respondents are mutating the I-B Namoona in the name of the 5th respondent in respect of the petitioner’s subject land, without following the due process of law. 3. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent authorities to follow the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in Chinnam Pandurangam v. Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and others reported in AIR 2008 AP 15, before effecting the mutation 4 in the revenue records and web land entries in respect of the subject land. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 26.09.2025 SPP 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 26815 OF 2025 Date: 26.09.2025 SPP