Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47100 (AP)

Sriramineni Prasad, v. The State of A.P., rep. by principal Secretary,

WP/41737/2018 · 2025-09-22

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010852022018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) F TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR ’ WRIT PETITION NO: 41737 OF 2018 . Between: Sriramineni Prasad,, S/o. Ramaiah, Hindu, Age- 50 years, Occ- Medical Practisioner, Resident of Riyadh, Soudi Arabia, Represented by His GPA Nagineni Rathalah, S/o. Venkaiah, Hindu, Aged about 67 years, Occ- Culitvation R/o. Flat 302, AVN Residency, Kondapur, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of A P rep by Principal Secretary, Law and Legislature Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist, A.P. 2. The Lok Adalat Bench, Narasaraopet, Guntur Dist, A.P. 3. Sriramineni Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Ramaiah, Hindu, Aged about 55 years, Occ- Radiologist, Aasaram Medical College cum Hospital Eluru Town, West Godavari Dist, A.P. 4. Nagineni Lakshmi Annapoorna, W/o. Murali Krishna, Hindu, Aged about 48 years, R/o. Navabharathnagar, Kurnool Road, Ongole, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for entire records connected to Lok Adalat Award in Lok Adalat Case No. 265 of 2016, passed by the 2 nd respondent Lok / Adalat Bench, Narasaraopet, examine and set aside the same, after declaring the same as illegal, irregular, and violative of provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987- and offends articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2^'" Respondent to transfer the suit to the regular court in O.S.No. 310 of 2015 on the file of the Hon’ble Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet, for adjudicating. lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the operation of the Lok Adalat Award passed in Lok Adalat case No. 265 of 2016, dt! 7-11-2016 by the 2"^^ respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Couiisel for the Petitioner; SRI CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATURE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI S. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY (SC FOR APSLSA) Counsel for the Respondent No.3; SRI N SRIRAM MURTHY The Court made the following order: APHC010852022018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] m TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 41737/2018 Between: 1.SRIRAMINENI PRASAD,, S/0. RAMAIAH, HINDU, AGE- 50 YEARS, 'ocC- MEDICAL PRACTISIONER, RESIDENT OF RIYADH, SOUDI ARABIA, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA NAGINENI RATHAIAH, S/0. VENKAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC- CULITVATION R/0. FLAT 302, AVN RESIDENCY, KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1 the STATE OF A P REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW AND legislature DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST,A.P., 2.the LOK ADALAT bench, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DIST, A.P. 3 SRIRAMINENI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/0. RAMAIAH, HINDU, ';!^GED about 55 YEARS, OCC- RADIOLOGIST. AASARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE CUM HOSPITAL ELURU TOWN, WEST GODAVARI DIST. A.P- 4. NAGINENI LAKSHMI ANNAPOORNA, W/0. MURALI KRISHNA. HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. NAVABHARATHNAGAR, kurnool road, ONGOLE, ...RESPONDENT(S); petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 RRR,J & TCDSJ W.P.No.41737 of 2018 pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for entire records connected to Lok Adalat Award in Lok Adalat Case No. 265 of 2016, passed by the 2nd respondent Lok Adalat Bench, Narasaraopet, examine and set aside the same, after declaring the same as illegal, irregular, and violative of provisionsof the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987- and offends articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to transfer the suit to the regular court in O.S.No. 310 of 2015 on the file of the Honble Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet, for adjudicating and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2018 \ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of original or certified copy of Lok Adalath Award, dated 07.11.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and to receive the writ petition on file in the interest of justice and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the operation of the Lok Adalat Award passed in Lok Adalat case No. 265 of 2016, dt; 7-'11-2016 by the 21 d respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioner/ 3rd respondent to file the counter affidavit in the W.P. No. 41737 of 2018 on the file of this Hon' ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): I.S. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY (SC FOR APSLSA) 2.N SRIRAM MURTHY 3 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.41737of2018 The Court made the following Order: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised out of the Court and seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-T. SRINIVASA RAO assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri Chakravarthy P V S K, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy, (SC FOR APSLSA) [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri N Sriram Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies RAM v HIGH COURT DATED:23/09/2025 ORDER WP.NO. 41737 OF 2018 c? ov 2025 10 13: m O JJ ^ ★ Current iJection DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS