Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040011022025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/299/2025 Keji Gama @ Tatak Son of Late Keji Pacha, a permanent resident of Village Renchi Poriang, PO and PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Damin, PO Damin, PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Deputy Commissioner and 9 Ors Kurung Kumey District, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Koloriang. 2:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Kurung Kumey District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Additional Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Kurung Kumey District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Damin. 4:Pisa Sanjay Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Pisa Dawa a resident of Village Lee PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Pisa Takar Page No.# 2/4 Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Pisa Tallar a resident of Village Lee PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Pisa Kasung Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Piusa Kati a resident of Village Lee PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:Pisa Sakti Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Pisa Dawa a resident of Village Lee PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:Pisa Loram Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Pisa Tater a resident of Village Lee PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 9:Pisa Liju Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Pisa Kati a resident of Village Lee PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 3/4 10:Smti Pisa Yaha Age: 0 Occupation : Wife of Pisa Tatup a resident of Village Sarli PO Sarli PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Pramod Kr. Gour, S Bayor,T Kumar Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 03.07.2025 ORDER Heard Mr. T. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner who fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the authority in terms of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Mr. N. Ratan, learned Addl. Advocate General for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. M. Kato, learned DSGI are present and raised no objection, if the same is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty. Having considered the provisions of Section 51 and 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, the prayer for withdrawal of this writ petition is allowed and accordingly, this writ petition stands closed on withdrawal, Page No.# 4/4 with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy under the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. This writ petition stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant