APHC010036832024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 426/2024 Between: 1. K RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/O. VENGALA REDDY AGED 56 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR R/O. PLOT NO. 405, MURALI KRISHNA ENCLAVE, 4TH LINE, NELLORE, HARINATHAPURAM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI B RAJA SEKHAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI SAMSHER SINGH RAWATH I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.P. SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 3. SRI C HARI KIRAM, THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. SRI VENKATA RAMI REDDY, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE POLICE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED., POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 5. SRI PARDHA SARADHI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER A.P STATE POLICE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their wilful disobedience to the order dated 22.09.2023 passed in W.P.No. 21797 of 2023 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. C SUMON 2. K C VENKATA REDDY (SC FOR A P S P H) 3. 4. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA The Court made the following order: On earlier occasion, when the learned counsel for the respondents reported compliance of the orders, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondents that the orders of this Court have been complied with, there remains nothing for adjudication and contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, if the petitioner has any grievance, he is at liberty to file appropriate application in accordance with law. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS