[2025:RJ-JP:51347] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20271/2025 Dharmendra Singh S/o Gulab Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Sinsini, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to give appointment to the Petitioner on the post of Teacher Grade III Level I with all consequential benefits by operating the reserve/waiting list. ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction, respondents be directed to operate waiting list and fill up the vacant posts which are still lying vacant of Teacher Grade III Level I. [2025:RJ-JP:51347] (2 of 3) [CW-20271/2025] iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be direct to fill up the total advertised vacancies of Teacher Gr. III Level 1 by issuing reshuffle result while excluding the incumbents who did not join the duty. iv) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner as law laid down by this Hon’ble High Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024. (v) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:51347] (3 of 3) [CW-20271/2025] petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/466