Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47093 (CHH)

M/S SUDHA RICE MILL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/270/2024 · 2025-10-29

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:53048 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 270 of 2024 M/s Sudha Rice Mill Through - Proprietor - Raghvendra Singh, S/o Late Sanjay Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Kharsia Chowk, Ambikapur, P.S. Kotwali And District Sarguja, (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Block-2, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector (Food Department) Balrampur District - Balrampur (C.G.) 4 - The Food Controller / Food Officer Balrampur, District Balrampur (C.G.) 5 - The District Marketing Officer CG State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, District Balrampur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) __________________________________________________________ For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate For Resp No. 1 to 4/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate For Resp. No.5 : Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate _______________________________________________________ S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.11.01 11:01:28 +0530 -2- 30/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner is having efficacious alternate remedy under Chhattisgarh Rice Custom Milling Order, 2016 of filing appeal before the Collector and further, the Agreement which is relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner bears arbitration clause. He submits that after filing of this writ petition, quota for which petitioner was entitled has been released for custom milling of paddy. 2. Submission of learned counsel for the State is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition. 3. In view of submission of learned counsel or the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen