[2025:RJ-JP:40306-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 626/2025 Ram Pratap Yadav S/o Shri Suraj Bhan, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Ghodafer Choraha, Behind Rajput Hostel, Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. Additional Director General Of Police, (Personal), Jaipur. 4. Joint Secretary, Police Home (Group -I) Department, Jaipur. 5. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samee Khan with Ms. Sunita Meena HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 06/10/2025 1. One of the arguments raised by learned counsel for the appellant is that the DGP was not empowered to pass punishment orders after the appellant had attained the age of superannuation. He refers to Rule 7 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996. 2. We find that the argument, as advanced before us, has not been taken up by him before the learned Single Judge. [2025:RJ-JP:40306-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-626/2025] 3. Faced with the said submission, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he should be allowed to file review. 4. Without making any comments regarding the maintainability of review, we allow the appellant to withdraw this appeal and press whatever is available in law in review petition. 5. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ Rahul/Diksha/23