2025:UHC:8686 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/555/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. B.S. Adhikari and Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Present applicant “Prem Lal S/o Mohan Lal” is praying for regular bail in relation to FIR dated 04.12.2024, bearing FIR No. 263 of 2024 registered at P.S. Rajpur, District Dehradun wherein the present applicant along with one Jasbeer and unknown person were implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20/29/60 of the NDPS Act. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the alleged contraband which is shown to be recovered from the co- accused is commercial quantity i.e. 1.016 kg of Charas but there is no substantial compliance of Section 52A of the NDPS Act and inventory was not prepared. He further submits that applicant has no previous criminal history and the co- accused from whose possession the contraband was shown to be recovered has already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 09.07.2025. He further submits that in this case, present applicant has been made an accused for the offence punishable under Section 29 of the NDPS Act and there is no recovery from the present applicant. He further submits that present applicant is languishing in jail since 07.01.2025 and charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 5. On the other side, learned A.G.A. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, have not disputed this fact that the charge sheet has already been filed and co- accused Jasbeer, from whom alleged contraband was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail on 09.07.2025 by this Court. 2025:UHC:8686 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 07.01.2025 and charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of the custodial interrogation of the present applicant and co accused Jasbeer has already been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Prem Lal S/o Mohan Lal” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that after being released on bail, applicant shall join the trial proceedings on each and every date and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, failing which the trial court shall be at liberty to take appropriate legal action against the applicant including for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.09.2025 SKS 2025:UHC:8686