HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5731/2023 Dharmraj Son Of Shri Satpal Bidhuri, Resident Of House No. 133, Bidhuri Mohalla, Village Akheer, District Faridabad ( Haryana). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Rajesh Kumar Son Of Shri Balwant Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of B-28, Civil Lines, Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/11/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of investigation in the FIR No.48/2022 registered with the Police Station Chandwaji, Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC, the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 19.08.2025, a compromise has been submitted before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise and the same has been verified by the Investigating Officer. Counsel submits that the Directors of the company are residing abroad, hence they have authorized one Rajesh Kumar Singh-respondent to take necessary steps for withdrawal of the aforesaid FIR and (2 of 3) [CRLMP-5731/2023] the case which is pending before the Court. Counsel submits that all disputes pending between the parties have been withdrawn on the basis of the aforesaid compromise, hence the proceedings arising out of the FIR be quashed as all the offences are personal in nature. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner but counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant accepts the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties and submitted that the complainant has no objection in case, the aforesaid proceedings are quashed. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 5. In view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties and looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. Proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR No. 48/2022 registered with the Police Station Chandwaji, Jaipur Rural (3 of 3) [CRLMP-5731/2023] for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC, against the petitioner stand quashed and set-aside. 7. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/120