1 2025:CGHC:52453-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1368 of 2023 Vishwanath Shukla S/o Devi Prasad Shukla Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No.15, Near State Bank Of India, Police Station Lormi, Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Of Police Station Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Prachi Shukla W/o Vishwanath Shukla Aged About 28 Years Presently Residing At Chandipara, Police Station Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) with CRMP No. 1019 of 2023 1 - Santosh Kumar Shukla S/o Devi Prasad Shukla, Aged About 51 Years R/o Near Gayatri Mandir, Lormi, Ward No. 14, Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.10.29 10:57:12 +0530 2 2 - Devi Prasad Shukla, S/o- Late Chandrabhan Shukla, Aged About 75 Years R/o Near Gayatri Mandir, Lormi, Ward No. 14, Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 3 - Bhagwati Shukla, W/o Devi Prasad Shukla, Aged About 70 Years R/o Near Gayatri Mandir, Lormi, Ward No. 14, Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Of Police Station Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Prachi Shukla, W/o Vishwanath Shukla, Presently Residing At - Chandipara, P.S. - Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 28.10.2025 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press these petitions on repeated calls. 2. Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State is present and submits that the case is fixed for charge framing order in the trial Court. 3 3. In view of the above and considering the fact that no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioners, it appears that the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the present matters. 4. Accordingly, both the above captioned CRMPs are dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Consequently, the interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated. 6. Let the copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for doing the needful. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar