1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 676 of 2023 1 - Pradeep Kumar Dewangan S/o Naval Kumar Dewangan Aged About 37 Years Occupation - Office Assistant Grade Iii In Office Of S.E. (Oprn.) - Iii Ix 500 Mw Cspgcl K.W. R/o - Chhurikalan, Tehsil - Katghora, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Human Resources, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Chairman Chhattisgarh State Power Companies Limited Raipur, Danganiya, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Danganiya, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Director (H.R.) Chhattisgarh State Power General Company Limited (H.O.) Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Engineer (Gen.) Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Htps Korba West, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For State For Respondent : : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Order on Board 04.09.2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation to respondent/competent authority for the grievances projected in the writ petition, respondent/competent authority may be directed to consider and decide the same within the reasonable period of time in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, after considering the submissions made by the both the parties at bar and on perusal of the documents available on record, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority projecting all his grievances as projected in this writ petition along with the copy of petition within ‘15 days’ from today and in turn concerned respondent/competent authority is expected to consider and decide the same within the period of ‘45 days’ from submission of such representation taking into consideration the fact that juniors of has already been 3 promoted by ignoring the seniority of the present petitioner in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 5. If any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he may avail the remedy available under the law. 6. This Court does not express anything on the merits of this case. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Certified Copy as per rules. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Saxena