APHC010036092011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 6590 of 2011 Between: 1. M/S.RATNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, REP.BY ITS MANAGING, PARTNER M.KRISHNA RAO, R/O.1-33, BONKUL DIBBA OPP: EX.MLA HOUSE PARAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUBREGIONAL OFFICER THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT, FUND ORGANIZATION MARRIPALEM VUDA LAYOUT NAD POST VISAKHAPATNAM 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER M/S NATIONAL THERMAL POWER, CORPORATION, PARAWADA ,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER UTILITIY POWER TECH LTD, PARAWADA,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or orders more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the impugned order dated 12.10.2010 (signed on 11.9.2010) through proceedings No.AP/VP/PD Cell/Cc-55/AP/40890/2010/.1686 under section 14B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 as illegal arbitrary,unjustified and also in violation of principles of naturla justice and consequently direct the respondents 1&2 revise the same by setting 2 aside the order dated 12.10.2010(signed on 11.9.2010) through proceedings No.AP/VP/PD.Cell/CC-55/AP/40890/2010/1686 passed under section 14B & 7Q of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members and grant such other relief as it deeems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. R N REDDY 2. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY 3. R N REDDY (SC FOR EMPLOYS PF ORG ) 4. G SUDHA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri Yaswanth Karanki, learned counsel representing Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.07.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.6590 of 2011 Date: 18.07.2025 siva