1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1273 of 2025 1 - Rekha Pandey W/o Yogesh Pandey Aged About 29 Years R/o Behind Puri I T I, Chandranagar, Road No. 9 Ward No. 10 Kohka, Bhilai, District Durg C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shanti Devi W/o Sugriva Prasad Prajapati Aged About 66 Years R/o House No. 1326 Ward No. 9 Main Road Kohka, Kurud Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 2 - Santosh Kumar Prajapati S/o Late Sugreev Prasad Prajapati Aged About 47 Years Permanent R/o House No. 4, Type-3, Ittc Complex, Bsnl, Neelpur, Rajpura, Patilala, Punjab- 100101, Other Address- House No. 1326 Ward No. 9 Main Road Kohka, Kurud Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 3 - Smt. Sangeeta Pandit D/o Late Sugreev Prasad Prajapati Aged About 44 Years Permanent R/o Flat No. 1, Plot No. 19, Sweet Home Apartment, Nit Lay Out, Telecom Nagar, Nagpur, (Maharashtra), Other Address- House No. 1326 Ward No. 9 Main Road Kohka, Kurud Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 4 - Amit Kumar Prajapati S/o Narendra Prajapati Aged About 21 Years R/o - House No. 1326 Ward No. 9 Main Road Kohka, Kurud Bhilai, District Durg C.G./ Kudra, Jehanabad, District Ksimur-Jhaba Bihar. 5 - Smt. Manju Pandit W/o Nirmal Kumar Pandit Aged About 53 Years R/o B-28, Near Kota Mandir, Kota, Raipur C.G. 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Durg C.G. 7 - Deputy Registrar, Office Of The Deputy Registrar, District Office Durg, District Durg C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manay Nath Thakur, Advocate PAWAN KUMAR Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR Date: 2025.12.05 14:59:36 +0530 2 For Respondent(s) / State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, PL Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 05/12/2025 After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is pending since 2022 more than three years has been passed therefore, a direction may be issued to the trial Court to conclude the suit within a reasonable period of time. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is not inclined to issue a mandatory direction to the trial Court to conclude the suit within a fixed time frame. However, considering the nature of dispute, it is expected that the trial Court shall make an earnest endeavour to expedite the trial and conclude the proceedings at the earliest possible. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Pawan