ANUJ KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE RURAL DEVELP AND PANCHAYATI ORS
CW/22104/2017 · 2025-10-15
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47072 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47072 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42133] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22104/2017 Anuj Kumar Shukla S/o Shri Shambhu Prakash Sharma, Resident Of G-932, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur-302015 Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development & Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bhilwara.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Dausa.
5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Tonk.
6. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swapril Singh Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena, Advocate with Mr. Anshul Ranga, Advocate Ms. Anjali Ranga, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, A.A.G.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 15/10/2025 :
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved herein is no more res-integra and stands resolved by a judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh Chand Saini & Another Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Others, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18145/2024 decided on 04.09.2025 and, therefore, looking to the facts & circumstances of the case, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the aforesaid
judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not dispute the aforesaid facts.
[2025:RJ-JP:42133] (2 of 2) [CW-22104/2017] Heard. Perused. In view of the limited submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of in the light of the case of Ramesh Chand Saini (supra). Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J. ASHOK