IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.144 of 2025 Date of decision: 04.01.2025 Manik Sharma. ...Petitioner. Versus Executive Director (Pers.), HPSEB Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Junior T-Mate (Class-IV) at Pangi Valley, Electrical Division, HPSEB Ltd. Killar, District Chamba. The area falls under difficult/hard area under the applicable policy guidelines. The case set up by the petitioner is that on completion of 3 years and 9 months at the present place of posting, representation dated 12.11.2024 (Annexure P-3) was preferred to respondent No.1 seeking his transfer to a station of his choice. Petitioner’s 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- grievance is that aforesaid representation has not been decided by respondent No.1/competent authority till date. 4. Looking into the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct respondent No.1/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable policy within a period of four weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 4th January, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)