Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12757 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- 1- परमादेश के प्रकृ ित का िरट आदेश एवं िनदेर्श जारी कर प्रितउततरदाता संख्या 2 को आदेिशत एवं िनदेर्श करें िक प्रितउत्तरदाता संख्या तीन के द्वारा प्रितउत्तरदाता संख्या चार के िवरूद्ध संस्तुत की गई प्रारिम्भक जांच िदनांक 2.10.2024 (संलग्नक संख्या-4) को शीघ्रतापूवर्क (माननीय न्यायालय द्वारा तय समयाविध ) पूरा करायें अन्यथा यािचकाकतीर् को अपूणर्नीय क्षित होगी।
2- परमादेश के प्रकृ ित का िरट आदेश एवं िनदेर्श जारी कर प्रितउततरदाता संख्या 1 को आदेिशत एवं िनदेर्श करें िक प्रितउत्तरदाता संख्या 4 के द्वारा िदनांक 12.07.2024 को राित्र 10. :30 बजे यािचकाकतीर् के मौिलक अिधकारों के उल्लंघन के िलये माननीय न्यायालय द्वारा तय प्रितकर यािचकाकतीर् को प्रदान करें।
3. Pursuant thereto, Shri V.C. Dixit, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, which are taken on record, submits that a preliminary enquiry was conducted against the erring Inspector, and he was not found involved in the alleged illegal act.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to pursue such remedies as may be available to him in law with regard to damages and other reliefs. September 17, 2025 Sumaira Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Shrimati Anjani Yadav .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Rajya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad