Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47060 (ALL)

SMT. MEENA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/1083/2025 · 2025-05-18

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83945 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1083 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Meena Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court below i.e. Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi to decide the Case No.605 of 2023 (Meena Vs. Satyendra), under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., P.S. Chitaipur, District Varanasi, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. 3. It is submitted that the applicant before this Court is the aggrieved wife. 4. It reveals from the perusal of the record that earlier the opposite party no.2, the husband did not appear before the court resulting an ex-parte proceeding against him. However subsequently a recall application was moved by the husband and the said application is pending for disposal. 5. The trial court is directed to expedite this matter and firstly dispose of the recall application moved by the husband and if the ex-parte order is recalled, the trial court is further directed to make all the possible endeavors for expeditious disposal of this case. In case any application for interim maintenance has been moved, it should be decided within a period of 60 days from today. 6. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad