Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47052 (CHH)

VANDANA CHHATRI v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/577/2025 · 2025-11-25

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57440-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 577 of 2025 1 - Vandana Chhatri D/o Shri Virendra Chhatri Aged About 33 Years R/o Ward No. 58, Urla, Tehsil District Durg Chhattisgarh 2 - Vijay Chhatri S/o Shri Virendra Chhatri Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 58, Urla, Tehsil District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director General of Police Police Headquarters, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Inspector General of Police Durg Range, District - Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent of Police District - Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - The Station House Officer Police Station Mohan Nagar, District - Durg Chhattisgarh 6 - The Station House Officer Police Station City Kotwali, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh 7 - Saurabh Poddar S/o Shri S. Swarnkar Advocate, R/o Dahlia-477, B- Block, Talpuri, Bhilai, District - Durg Chhattisgarh 8 - Lucky Tamboli (Associate of Respondent No. 7) (Address And Other Details To Be Ascertained During Investigation) 9 - Smt. Monika Gupta Head Constable, Police Station Mohan Nagar, District - Durg Chhattisgarh ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.11.26 15:15:46 +0530 2 10 - Mr. Uttam Soni Then Police Official Of Thana Mohan Nagar, Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For Respondent-State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 26.11.2025 1. None appears for the petitioners even in the second round when the matter is called out for hearing. Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No.1 to 6, is present. 2. The petition has been listed under the category of “For Orders [on office notes]” as the details of certain annexures have not been properly mentioned, advance copy has not been served upon the State, and moreover, certain portions of some pages annexed with the petition are not legible. 3. In view of the aforesaid defects and considering that the petition suffers from substantial procedural irregularities, this Court is not inclined to entertain the matter. 3 4. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed on the ground of default alone, without entering into the merits of the case. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu