DHIRAJ GEHLOT AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR
CRLMP/4867/2016 · 2025-11-07
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44712] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4867/2016
1. Dhiraj Gehlot S/o Har Krishan Gehlot;
2. Har Krishan Gehlot S/o Shri Ramdayal Gehlot;
3. Smt. Veena Gehlot W/o Shri Har Krishan Gehlot; All resident of Local Address SAr Pratap Colony, Airforce Road, Jodhpur, At present R/o 7, Hamiltan Road, Reading, Berkshire, RGI-5RA, United Kingdom. ----Accused/Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. Bhavana Gehlot W/o Dhiraj Gehlot D/o Shri Mitha Lal Saini, resident of Kundera Dungar Sikrai, District Dausa at present GA-9 Ram Nagaer, EXT Sodala, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/11/2025
1. In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing FIR No.61/2016 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jaipur (South) for the offences under Section 498-A & 406 of IPC.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after lodging of FIR, decree of divorce has been passed for dissolution of marriage between the parties by 'HM Courts & Tribunals Service The Family Court at Bury St. Edmunds' (U.K.) and thereafter, the complainant has also performed marriage with some other person.
[2025:RJ-JP:44712] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4867/2016]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that after completion of investigation, police has proposed negative final report, which has already been accepted by the competent Court. The factual report submitted by learned Public Prosecutor dated 16.02.2024 is taken on record.
4. In view of above submissions, no cause of action for pursuing the instant petition survives and the instant criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /29