Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47049 (RAJ)

JITENDRA S/O UDAY SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11134/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45246] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11134/2025 Jitendra S/o Uday Singh, R/o Udasar Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Shivraj Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Naman Maheshwari HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 133/2024 registered at Police Station Halena District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is owning a firm for distribution and sale of tractor and has carried out several business transactions. It is further submitted that the applicant has entered into a contract and has paid money in pursuance of the same. It is further submitted that the matter at hand is purely civil in nature. It is further submitted that the matter at hand is triable by the Magistrate. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the instant bail application and submitted that there are as many as three criminal antecedents pending against the applicant. It is further submitted that there was a clear malafide on behalf of the applicant while carrying out the transactions. [2025:RJ-JP:45246] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11134/2025] 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the matter at hand is primarily of civil in nature; that the matter is triable by Magistrate and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused- applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to direct that the applicant shall mark his attendance before the concerned Investigating Officer on 24.11.2025 at 11:00 A.M. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Halena District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No. FIR No. 133/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Jitendra S/o Uday Singh shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/237