APHC010546362014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34970/2014 Between: 1. SRI. SHAIK ISMAIL, S/O CHABUMIYAH SAHEB AGED 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.24/II/ 222, SHANTI NAGAR, DARGAMITTA NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. SRI. RACHURI VENKATESWARLU, S/O BRAHMIAH AGED 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O 17-1-523, CHAKALAVEEDI, NEAR RAO'S COLLEGE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SRI. SHAIK IMTHIYAZ, S/O SHAIK ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O D.NO.24/II/ 222, SHANTI NAGAR, DARGAMITTA NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SMT. SHAIK NIKATH, W/O SHAIK IMTHIYAZ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO.24/II/ 222, SHANTI NAGAR, DARGAMITTA NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. SRI. K. PRAVEEN RAGHAVAN, S/O K. VIJAYA RAGHAVAN, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O H.NO.25-2-532, 3RD CROSS ROAD, OLD SBI COLONY, A.K.NAGAR, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 6. SMT. SYED FARHEN, W/O SYED SALEEM AGED 39 YERS, R/O 20/873, MULAPET, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 7. SMT. SYED JABEEN, W/O SYED AIAZ AGED 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE R/O D. NO. 21/ 421, YAHALI STREET, ZANDAVEEDI, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION), SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NELLORE, REP. BY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, SPSR , NELLORE DISTRICT 3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR NELLORE MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, - 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 4. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, though the respondent authorities proposed to take up the construction on GNT road and to mark certain portions of the petitioner’s property. Subsequently, that plan was shelved and the survey report was discarded. 2. It is also stated in the written instructions that any further proposed road-widening activity would be in accordance with the procedure of law. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR